Water Management

Preventing runoff and soil erosion by using synthetic polymers under sprinkler irrigation and rainfall conditions

Moving sprinkler irrigation system (MSIS) as a solution for runoff and erosion of soil fertility


Arid and semiarid regions, such as Israel, are characterized by lack of fresh water sources and highly variable precipitation. In addition, the fresh water resources in these regions are expected to decrease as a result of global warming, while the population continues to grow and the demand for this water increases.

Therefore, the strategy for management of water and soil resources in these regions should be designed to maximize or optimize crop production, while conserving water and avoiding soil degradation. Soils in arid and semiarid regions are characterized by unstable structure, and consequently, extensive runoff and soil erosion are occurring in these regions. Surface runoff could cause flooding downstream, and water for crop production may be lost (Ben-Hur, 2008). These runoff and erosioncould decrease the soil fertility and increase environmental pollution.

The moving sprinkler irrigation system (MSIS) (Fig. 1) has become increasingly popular in irrigation of field crops in modern agriculture. The advantages of MSIS are automation, large areal coverage, and ability to operate on relatively rough terrain. However, as an MSIS is designed to apply controlled amounts of water within relatively short periods, the instantaneous rate of water application (application rate) of these systems is high. The water application rate of an MSIS with spray nozzle emitters can be >100 mm h-1, compared with ~10 mm h-1 or less for fixed micro-sprinkler or impact sprinkler heads. This high application rate of the MSIS could cause high runoff during the irrigation.
When soil surface is exposed to water drop impact under rainfall or sprinkler irrigation conditions, a seal could be developed at the soil surface. This seal is relatively thin, and is characterized by greater density, higher strength, finer pores, and lower hydraulic conductivity than the underlying soil, and could lead to a drastic decrease of infiltration rate (IR) (Ben-Hur, 2008).
It was suggested that the formation of a seal involves two main mechanisms: (i) physical disintegration of soil aggregates, caused by raindrop impact, and (ii) dispersion of clay particles and their movement into regions of reduced porosity, where they become lodged and plug the conducting pores. The relative importance of these two mechanisms depends on the impact energy of the water drops, the electrical conductivity (EC) of the applied water, and the exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP) of the soil. As the EC of the applied water decreases and the ESP of the soil increases, seal formation is enhanced and the IR decreases. Therefore, it is important to maintain the stability of the soil structure during its wetting. One means to increase the soil structure stability is by using synthetic polymers. Polymers consist of repeated small, identical units (monomers) coupled together to form extended chains. Polymers are characterized mainly by their molecular weight, molecular conformation (coiled or stretched), and charge type and density. The present review paper addresses the effects of synthetic polymers on IR, runoff, erosion, and crop production under sprinkler irrigation and rainfall conditions in Israel.

Polymer use under sprinkler irrigation

Measured amounts of runoff from 3-m2 cotton and peanut plots during various MSIS irrigation events are presented in Fig. 2. Anionic polyacrylamide (PAM) was added to the soil surface at a rate of 20 kg/ha, by spraying prior to the first irrigation. The cotton and peanut plots were irrigated by MSIS at average water application rates of 160 and 100 mm/h, respectively.


In general, runoff was significantly lower in the PAM treatment than in the control for both soils (Fig.2), but PAM was more effective in the vertisol than in the loess. The runoff decrease in the PAM treatments resulted from the polymer activity that increased aggregate stability at the soil surface and limited seal formation. It was found also in this study that the soil loss from untreated (control) fallow plots was significantly higher than from PAM-treated ones (Table 1). The same trend was found in cotton and peanut plots, but the differences, in general, were not statistically significant (Table 1). In the cotton and peanut plots, the plants canopies protected the soil surface from the impact of the wa­ter drops, and consequently minimized the effect of the polymer.

Ben-Hur (2001) study the effect of nonionic polymer (P-101) on runoff (Fig. 3) and tuber yield of potatoes (Fig. 4) grown in loess soil and irrigated with a linear MSIS with three emitter types, No. 1, Spinner and Super spray, which differed in their discharge rates. For each emitter type, the runoff amounts for the entire irrigation season in all polymer treatments were lower than those in the control (Fig. 3). The potato yields in all polymer treatments for each emitter type were higher than those in the control, but these differences were not statistically significant (Fig. 4), apparently because the small number of replicates (three). The irrigation efficiency (the ratio between plant yield and total water application) in Sprayer No. 1, Super Spray and Spinner emitters for the control treatment (untreated soil) was 56, 43 and 31 kg/mm, respectively, compared with 66.3, 65.0, and 48.5 kg/mm, respectively, in the 40-kg/ha polymer treatment.


It can be concluded that polymer use in fields irrigated with an MSIS has beneficial effects of reducing runoff and erosion and of increasing the yields of some crops. However, the eventual implementation of the polymers in commer­cial fields will require performance of more field experiments, in large-scale in particularly, to evaluate dif­ferent polymers and application methods, in order to improve polymer handling and effectiveness.

 *Significant differences between control and PAM treatments in the same irrigation event and on the same soil.


Fig. 1: Moving sprinkler irrigation system irrigate cotton field


Stabilizing steep slopes with polymers

Steep bare slopes, especially those of cuttings or earth-filled embankments, exposed to rain­fall are extremely susceptible to runoff and erosion. Agassi and Ben-Hur (1991) found in sandy loam soil from Israel’s coastal plain, that annual erosion from 10-m long embankments with a 48% slope, exposed to annual rainfall of 520 mm was 299 Mg/ha from plots with a northern aspect and 416 Mg/ha from plots with a western aspect.

The rill and gully erosion that occur under such conditions can endanger the stability of the embankment itself and that of nearby structures.

Runoff and erosion on earth embankments can be prevented by stabilizing the aggregates at the soil surface with soil conditioners. The effects of 70 kg/ha of cationic polysaccharide (PS) + 10 t/ha of phosphogyp­sum (PG), 20 kg/ha of anionic PAM + 10 t/ha of PG, and of 200 kg/ha of PS on erosion were studied by Agassi and Ben-Hur (1992). This study was conducted at three different sites in Israel with steep embankments (33 to 60% slopes) under natural rainfall condi­tions. The studied plots were 2 m in width and of various lengths, ranging from 12 to 20 m, and the soils had clay contents ranging from 10 to 64% and ESPs ranging from 1 to 20%. The PG and the polymers were sprayed on the soil surface before the rainy season. The soil losses in the various sits with the different treatments are presented in Fig. 5 for two winters. The soil losses in the treatments SP + PG and PAM + PG were 6 to 10 times smaller than those in the control (untreated soil) (Fig. 5). Visual observa­tion of the soil surface in the PS + PG and control treatments (Fig. 6) supported the above results.


I was concluded from the above results that PS and PAM molecules in the presence of PG adsorbed onto the soil particles in the aggregates, and acted as a cementing material, that stabilized the soil aggregate against the destruc­tive forces of the raindrops. The stabilizing effect of PG on the aggregates was a result of two factors:

(i) The PG dissolution increased the elec­trolyte concentration in the soil so­lution, and thus limiting the clay dispersion.

(ii) PG dissolution released Ca+2 cations into the soil solution. These cations increased the adsorption of the PAM molecules by acting as bridges between the negative charge of the clay and the PAM molecules. In the case of the PS, the Ca+2 cations may have provided competition for the adsorption of the PS molecules, and this, in turn, pro­moted its deeper penetration into the aggregates, so enhancing their stabilizing effect.




Left: Fig. 2: Percentage runoff from polyacrylamide (PAM) treated and control plots in two soils irrigated with a moving sprinkler irrigation system. Vertical lines indicate two standard deviations. Numbers in parentheses indicate cumulative depth of irrigation in mm (after Levy and Ben-Hur, 1998).

Right: Fig. 3: Averages of total runoff in the entire growing season for various polymer applications and emitter types in potato field irrigated with a moving sprinkler irrigation system. The vertical bars represent standard deviations, and for each emitter type, different letters labeling columns indicate significant differences, at p <0.05, between the polymer treatments (after Ben-Hur, 2001).




Left: Fig. 4: Average potato yields for various polymer applications and e

mitter types in field irrigated with a moving sprinkler irrigation system. The vertical bars represent standard deviations (after Ben-Hur, 2001).

Right: Fig. 5: Total soil losses from untreated plots (control) and from plots treated with polysaccharide (PS) + phosphogypsum (PG), polyacrylamide (PAM) + PG, and PS, in various sites during the 1989/90 and 1990/91 winters. The vertical bars represent standard deviations (after Agassi and Ben-Hur, 1992).







Left: Fig. 6: Soil surface of untreated (control) plot and of plot treated with polysaccharide (PS) + phosphogyp­sum (PG) at the end of the 1989/90 winter (from Agassi and Ben-Hur, 1992)

Right: Table1: Soil loss from Vertisol and loess irrigated with moving sprinkler irrigation system for control (untreated soil) and 20 kg/ha polyacrylamide (PAM) treatments (follow Levy and Ben-Hur, 1998).

Agassi M, Ben-Hur M (1991) Effect of slope length, aspect and phosphogypsum on runoff and erosion from steep slopes. Australian Journal of Soil Research 29: 197-207. Agassi M, Ben-Hur M (1992). Stabilizing steep slopes with soil conditioners and plants. Soil Technology 5: 249-256. Ben-Hur M (2001) Soil conditioner effects on runoff, erosion and potato yield under sprinkler irrigation with different emitters. Agronomy Journal 93:1156-1163. Ben-Hur, M. (2008). Seal formation effects on soil infiltration and runoff in arid and semiarid regions under rainfall andsprinkler irrigation conditions. In: Climatic Changes and Water Resources in the Middle East and in NorthAfrica (F. Zereini and W. Jaeschke eds.), p. 429-452, Springer-Verlang, Berlin Heidelberg. Levy, G.J. and Ben-Hur, M. (1998). Some uses of water-soluble polymers in soil. In: HandBook of soil conditioners (A. Wallach ed.), p. 399-428. Marcel Dekker, In., New York.

(c) Institute of Soil, Water and Environmental Sciences, the Volcani Center, ARO, P.O. Box 6, Bet Dagan 50250, Israel.

(Published in ISRAEL AGRICULTURE, 2013)

Related Articles

Back to top button
Skip to content